Sep 02

September 2, 2010.

The flyer being circulated is asking good questions.

SWO Flyer 09 02 10

August 31, 2010.

The Tribal Council voted this afternoon on whether or not to follow the Constitution.

Remove: 4

Not-Remove: 4      Chairman Selvage was the deciding vote and he voted to NOT-REMOVE.

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?

The SWO Constitution is only followed when it suits the personal needs of the political majority on Council.

WHAT TO DO?

We need to meet as a Community. Sadly, it appears that we have to hire our own attorney’s just to make our elected officials follow the rules…to legally and ethically represent the people…not what we have been witnessing.

WHEN IS ENOUGH…ENOUGH???

Continue reading »

  • Share/Bookmark
Sep 02

If you or anyone you know was terminated from any of our Tribal Entities in the past five years or so…and you feel that you or they did not receive fair treatment…please contact me ASAP by email with your name, the situation with as much detail as possible, and a contact cell phone or at least a way to get in touch with you:  info@swoyate.info

  • Share/Bookmark
Aug 31

For some time now, we have all had a front-row seat in watching the political leadership of the Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate. The most recent activity, dealing with the snubbing of the SWO Constitution by not removing a Councilman for a drug-use violation, and the Administrative activity of the past year is what got me thinking about our individual responsibilities to speak out with courage and moral clarity.

The twisting and turning of facts by the Chairman and his followers on Council has corrupted the flow of facts to the Tribal members. The misinformation is one of the reasons I started this blog.

As a student of history, I came across a few readings on the rise and fall of the Third Reich. One of the propaganda techniques used by that regime was “the big lie.” The basis of which is that if you make an incorrect statement, no matter how outrageous it is and repeat it often enough, some people will believe it.

“…that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.” —Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, vol. I, ch. X.

We don’t have to like our Politicians, either as a person or as a politician. Our leadership positions have been cheapened with self-service activity and misinformation. Out of respect for the community that they represent, they do owe us ethical and honest decisions. They owe us the facts, the critical reasoning and documentation behind the decisions they make on our behalf.

The continuing misinformation being distributed by our Chairman in his monthly reports to Council, the most recent Tribal Council decisions and their inability to be honest in daily activity are examples of the big lie. Those who contribute to it are doing it intentionally for their own personal gain.

No individual person can end this perpetual big lie and political strategy that we are caught in, it is going to take the courage of the community to come together and make it right.

  • Share/Bookmark
Aug 29

Indian Country Today – Angelique EagleWoman – distinguished in many ways

Stephen Jackson, Jr. – New Executive Director of the Kansas City Indian Center

Matt Cordell graduates from U.S. Merchant Marine Academy

  • Share/Bookmark
Aug 26

Councilmen and Executives LOVE to order people around behind the scenes…but, they will never own up to it, nor will they put it in writing…because that means taking accountability…I have seen this first hand, it happens more often than we would like to think.

There are two houses that are apparently in need of fixing, and urgent enough for the Chairman and Councilman Roberts to be ‘telling’ the CDBG staff to put these two folks at the top of the list…even though they are not on the list to begin with.

1) Donny Eastman – on the REB as an alternate…nobody knows why this is such a rush, it just is.

2) Roxanne Roberts – the interesting fact about the house that Roxanne lives in…is that Kevin actually owns that house, not Roxanne…so, he is pushing to have his own house fixed.

Disappointing “tribal politics”…a little more to show why I have been calling it “Junior-High Politics”.

My prediction is that either the tribal member(s) in charge of the CDBG will either resign or be terminated for not doing what they were told, even though it breaks protocol.

The concern is what happens when politicians put people on the ICDBG Home-Repair list that were not part of the grant proposal is that it turns into more expenditure of gaming funds.

The politician makes a promise to an individual in return for support or a vote. Of course, this is not approved in the Grant, and no one finds out until the Grant is finished. Then you have a large number of political favors that become known as “Dis-allowed Costs”…

The Grant is written with an ‘approved’ number of folks on the list…there is no ‘adding’ to the Grant list after the fact. The added Dis-allowed Costs have to be paid for by the Tribe, and the only money the Tribe has is Gaming Funds. So the politicians are using our Gaming Funds for Political Capital.

  • Share/Bookmark
Aug 24

Updated: August 26, 2010.

Here is the SWO Court Ruling. Let me know your thoughts. Thanks.

MJ Roberts v SWO Res-Elect-Board RULING 8 25 10

Patricia was fighting the relevancy and Contradictions of the Residency Requirement as well.

Patricia Roth v SWO Res-Elect-Board RULING 08 25 10

Updated: August 24, 2010.

The Tribal Attorneys added another argument to exert their sovereign authority against someone that has the ‘audacity’ to challenge their weak rule of law. The following additional 9-pager was thrown at me without warning, so the markings are my highlighter marks in a quick read.

SWO Memorandum of Law Denying MJR Candidacy_Again 08 24 10

I am not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV…but I thought it would be nice to show you my notes…here they are, all 4 pages…

MJR LEGAL ARGUMENTS FOR CANDIDACY

Continue reading »

  • Share/Bookmark
Aug 20

The controversy surrounding Chairman Selvage’s Administration continues…Read the documents and make your own determination.  I will post the minutes as soon as I receive a copy, but here is the current argument, and the Resolution itself.

SWO Vice-Chairman Challenge to Chairman Candidacy 08 19 10

SWO Council Resolution SWST-02-049

From a review of the argument it appears that we have a serious issue of either “forged documents” or “serious mistake” in the Official Records of our Tribal Council Resolutions and Minutes. Whether this is an isolated incidence or not will now have to be determined in a thorough examination of all Official Tribal Documentation.

The Districts will have to call for a Formal Investigation into the Tribe’s Official Documentation – making sure that our Official Government Records have not been tampered with, and if they have been, find out who is responsible and take necessary Legal Action.

In his statement, the Vice-Chairman asked valid questions that need to be answered:

1) Did the former Chairman and Secretary attest to a lie?

2) How could such a mistake happen?

3) Do we really want to know?

What do you think?

  • Share/Bookmark
Aug 18

This motion does not make sense. What Council is saying, is that our Tribal Council knows more about the Law than our Public Defender.

Regular Tribal Council Minutes; Tuesday, May 04, 2010; Page 5.

MOTION NO. 18: made by David Redthunder, second by Joyce Country, question by Norma Perko, to not allow the SWO Public Defender to represent Tribal Members when the Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate is the plaintiff.

WEIGHTED VOTE ON MOTION NO. 18: 14 for: Floyd Kirk, Jr. (2); Norma Perko (2); Winfield Rondell, Jr. (3); David Redthunder (2); Joyce Country (2); Terri Larsen (1); Tribal Vice-Chairman (1); Tribal Secretary (1). 0 Opposed. 0 Abstained. 0 Absent From Vote. 1 Not Voting: Tribal Chairman.

MOTION PASSED.

There is no Separation of Powers in our Tribe.

I want to know what everyone else thinks about this.

Below is what I found out about this motion.

Continue reading »

  • Share/Bookmark
Aug 16

Attached is the entire document, but here is my favorite part:

“Mr. Roberts’ Constitutional right to equal political rights, as established in the Bill of Rights, has not been affected by the living within the boundaries requirements. Mr. Roberts, like all Tribal members, have an equal right to live on the Reservation and run for political office if they are otherwise qualified. Mr. Roberts’s choice to live in Savage, Minnesota, does not deprive him of any Constitutional right. Rather, his choice, and his choice alone, disqualifies him as a qualified candidate.”

What?!?!   I am sorry, but the entire argument would get a C- in graduate school…at best.

SWO REB Final Decision and Denial 08 16 10

I have five days to file as I just signed for the letter this morning. Next step: Tribal Court.

How many would like to attend and hear the Court???

FYI: Almost the same exact wording for Patricia Roth.

Patricia Roth Denial by SWO REB 08 12 10

  • Share/Bookmark
Aug 11

I wanted to share with everyone a little background that I found in my research on the Bill of Rights.

The purpose of a Bill of Rights is to enumerate certain individual liberties that must be protected against government infringement.

The original US Constitution, which our Tribal Constitution is allegedly modeled after, was ratified in 1789 and did not include a Bill of Rights. It only took two short years for the States to recognize that citizens god-given rights had to be protected from the government.

In 1791 the Bill of Rights was added to the US Constitution.

The residents of the States realized that government by the will of the majority not only achieved Democracy, but it also sometimes achieved majoritarian tyranny. Much like what is happening our system.

The system of checks and balances created by the original US Constitution was insufficient to avoid the pitfalls of absolute power.

So, a Bill of Rights was needed to serve as a defense between individual liberty and arbitrary government power.

The Bill of Rights: US Original Ten Bill of Rights

SWO Bill of Rights:

“All members of the Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate shall be accorded equal political rights and equal opportunities to participate in the economic resources and activities of the Tribe, and no person shall be denied freedom of conscience, speech, association or assembly, or due process of law, or the right to petition for the redress of grievances. The members of the Tribe shall continue undisturbed in their religious beliefs and nothing in this Revised Constitution and By-Laws will authorize either the Council or the General Council to interfere with these traditional religious practices according to their customs.”

Majoritarianism: –noun– rule by a majority, esp. the belief that those constituting a simple majority should make the rules for all members of a group, nation,etc.

  • Share/Bookmark
preload preload preload